Analysis of diversity and traits affecting yield in cotton landraces of Iran

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Agricultural and Horticultural Science Research Department, Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Mashhad, 91769-83641, Ir

2 Agricultural and Horticultural Science Research Department, Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Mashhad, 91769-83641, Iran.

3 Researcher of Horticulture Crop Research Department, Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Resaerch and Education Center, AREEO, Mashhad, Iran.

4 Assistant Professor of Plant Breeding Department, Cotton Research Institute of Iran, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Gorgan, 49166-85915, Iran.

10.22092/ijcr.2024.365722.1214

Abstract

Background and objectives: Diverse plant genetic materials are potential treasures that are considered valuable support for plant breeding programs, because the plant breeding research is based on wide genetic diversity, and basically, without diversity, breeding and selection will have no meaning. This study was conducted to evaluate the diversity of different cotton landraces and identify the traits affecting their yield.
 Materials and methods: In this study, 44 landraces of cotton were cultivated in the agricultural research station of Kashmir during the two years of 2018 and 2019. The traits of the number of open and closed bolls, crown diameter, crop yield, boll weight, number of monopodial and sympodial branches, plant height, and crop maturity were measured. Descriptive statistics, trait × genotype (GT) biplot analysis, factor analysis, and cluster analysis were used to investigate the objectives of this research. Statistical analyzes were performed based on the average of two-year data. In analyzing of descriptive statistics, JUMP software was used, SPSS 21 software was used for factor analysis and cluster analysis, and GEA-R software was used for GT biplot analysis. Results: Based on the average of two-year data, the range of boll weight and the number of closed bolls were high, which indicates the diversity of the investigated genotypes for the mentioned traits. Comparison between genotypes based on multiple traits made it possible to distinguish different genotypic groups. Cluster analysis of studied traits classified the genotypes into four main groups. The first group obtained from cluster analysis was earlier, but had the lowest average plant height, the number of monopodial and sympodial branches, the number of open bolls, and crown diameter. On the other hand, the second and third groups had the lowest amount of earliness. The genotypes of the second group had the lowest boll weight, the number of shoot branches, and the crown diameter, and the third group had the highest plant height, the number of branches, and the number of open bolls. The genotypes of the forth group had the highest earliness and the number of closed bolls. In order to increase earliness and reduced the plant height, the selection of genotypes from the first group for breeding programs can be helpful in obtaining cultivars with greater tolerance to environmental stresses, including drought. It is also possible to use the genotypes of the third group with the highest number of open bolls to cross with the genotypes of the first group in order to create quality and early cultivars. 
Conclusions:  There was considerable genetic diversity among the studied landraces in terms of most of the evaluated traits, indicating high potential for improving these traits through targeted selection in the breeding programs. The boll weight was the most important factor affecting the yield of cotton, and the fiber component had a greater effect on the boll weight of some studied genotypes than the seed component.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Alaeddin, N., Navvabpour, S., and Fathi Saadabadi, M. 2021. Investigating the relationships of quantitative and qualitative characteristics with performance and performance components in cotton cultivars. Iranian Journal of Cotton Researches 9 (2): 145-164.
  2. Alishah, O. 2020. Assessment of genetic variability, heritability and association of plant attributes with lint yield and fiber quality in advanced lines of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) Iranian Journal of Crop Science 22 (4): 350-364. (in Persian with English Abstract).
  3. Alishah, O. 2016. Introduction of Iranian landraces of cotton. Promotional bulletin, Cotton Research Institute of Iran.
  4. Alishah, O. 2013. Genetics and breeding of Cotton. Academic Publishing Publications, 195 p.
  5. Alishah, O., Begherieh-Najjar, M.B., and Fahmideh, L. 2008. Correlation, path coefficient and factor analysis of some quantitative and agronomic traits in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Asian Journal of Biological Science, 1(2): 61-68.
  6. Damavande Kamali, S., Alishah, E., and Jelodar, N.B. 2009. Investigate the interaction of genotype and environment and sustainability performance of cotton varieties by parametric and non-parametric method of single - variable. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 48: 41-50. (In Persian with English Abstract).
  7. Djaboutou, M.C., Sinha, M.G., Houedjissin, S.S., Cacai, G.H., and Ahanhanzo, C. 2017. Variability and heritability of morphological traits in collection of cotton genotypes (Gossypium hirsutum) and their potential use for the selection. European Scientific Journal 13 (3): 385-395.
  8. Eskandari Torbaghan, M. 2020. Comparison of Iranian promising lines of cotton in irrigation condition with very salty water. In: Proceedings 2th International Conference of Salinity in Yazd. 19 Feb. Yazd, Iran.
  9. Farooq, J., Anwar, M., Riaz, M., Farooq, A., Mahmood, A., Shahid, M.T.H., Rafiq, M., and Ilahi, F. 2014. Correlation and path coefficient analysis of earliness, fiber quality and yield contributing traits in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Journal of Animal and Plant Science 24(3): 781-790.
  10. Kamali, A. 2013. The effect of drought stress on yield and yield component using biplot analysis. M.Sc. thesis. Zabol University.
  11. Kamali, A., Fakheri, B.A., and M. Zabet. 2015. The study of drought stress effect on yield and yield components of cotton using biplot analysis. Iranian Journal of Cotton Research 3 (1): 33-47. (in Persian with English Abstract).
  12. Marzban, M. 2022. Evaluation of yield and yield components of different cotton cultivars and lines under different moisture regimes (study location: Kashmar). MSc Thesis of Water Science and Engineering, Birjand University.
  13. Mirlohi, A., Majidi, M.M., and Esmaeilzadeh Moghaddam, M. 2013. Principles of plant breeding. Arkan Danesh, Isfahan, Iran.
  14. Mohammadi, S.A., and Prasanna, B.M. 2003. Analysis of genetic diversity in crop plants- salient statistical tools and considerations. Crop Science 43: 1235-1248.
  15. Najjar, H. 2023. Evaluation and comparison of quantitative and qualitative characteristics of forty-four Iranian landraces of cotton in Kashmar. Final Report of the Research Project. 28 pages.
  16. Najjar, H., Taherian, M., Ramazani Moghaddam, M.R., and Eskandari Torbaghan, M. 2022. Evaluation of variation and identification of effective traits on seed cotton yield in Iranian upland cotton genotypes (Gossypium hirsutum). Journal of Crop Breeding, 14 (42): 22-30. (in Persian with English Abstract).
  17. Pacheco, A., Vargas, M., Alvarado, G., Rodríguez, F., Crossa, J., and Burgueño, J. 2015. GEA-R (Genotype xEnvironment Analysis with R for Windows) Version 4.1, https://hdl.handle.net/11529/10203, CIMMYTResearch Data & Software Repository Network, V16.
  18. Rahemi, M.R., and Alishah, O. 2023. Investigating the effect of morphological, qualitative and yield traits in order to identify the most promising cotton genotypes in Hashem Abad, Gorgan. Iranian Journal of Cotton Researches 10(1): 133-148.
  19. Ramazani, S.H.R., and Abdipour, M. 2018. Statistical analysis of grain yield in Iranian cultivars of barley (Hordeum vulgare ). Journal of Agricultural Research 8: 239-246.
  20. Saeidnia, F., Majidi, M.M., and Mirlohi, A. 2023. Evaluation of genetic variation and simultaneous selection for seed and forage yield in selected genotypes of Dactylis glomerata and Bromus inermis. Journal of Crop Production and Processing 13(2): 33-56. (in Persian with English abstract).
  21. Saeidnia, F., and Najjar, H. 2024. Effect of different irrigation levels on yield and yield components of some promising lines of cotton. Journal of Soil and Plant Interactions 14 (4): 67-84. (in Persian with English abstract).
  22. SAS Institute. 2013. JUMP Ver. 11.0.0. SAS Institute, Inc, Cary
  23. Seddigh, S., Zabet, M., Ghanbari, M.G., and Samadzadeh, A.R. 2016. Identification of superior varieties of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) under drought stress and normal conditions using GGE biplot and GBT biplot method in Birjand. Journal of Crop Breeding, 8 (19): 134-144. (in Persian with English Abstract).
  24. Sekloka, E., Sabi, A.K., Zinsou, V.A., Aboudou, A., Ndogbe, C.K., Afouda, L., and Baba-Moussa, L. 2018. Phenological, morphological and agronomic characterization of sixteen genotypes of cotton plant (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in rainfed condition in Benin. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science 10(2): 33-40.
  25. Tabatabaei, S.A., Shakeri, E., and Hamidnejad, M.M. 2013. Comparison of the qualitative and quantitative traits of improved and native varieties of cotton in Yazd condition. Journal of agricultural Research 4 (2): 135-146. (in Persian).
  26. Vafaeitabar, T., and Talat, F. 2009. Quantitative and qualitative traits of some promising cotton cultivar in Varamins region. Journal of Agricultural Science 5: 245-256. (in Persian).
  27. Yan, W., and Rajcan, I. 2002. Biplot analysis of sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Science 42: 11-20.