Determination of boll picking force and energy in the four cotton variety

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 M.Sc. Student, Mechanical Biosystems Department, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Mechanical Biosystems Department, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Mechanical Biosystems Department, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran.

4 Associated Prof., Cotton Research Institute of Iran, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization(AREEO), Gorgan, Iran

Abstract

Cotton is one of the most useful and economical plants that its cultivation is going to the decrease in Iran because of manual harvesting difficulties. Knowing the mechanical properties of the different parts of the cotton will help in selection and substitution of the mechanized method instead of a manual method. The bolls which are used in cotton in this research was separated from pedicles randomly; and the effects of loading speed and moisture content of boll on force and energy, that is needed for harvesting at four variety of bolls (Golestan, Khorshid, Sajedi, and Kashmar) in the different harvesting of cotton was analyzed by using the traction-pressure device. The results showed that the effects of variety and speed of loading, and also mutual effects of variety in the speed of loading and harvesting time in variety has meaning on the force of picking in 1% level, but the effect of harvesting time and mutual effect of harvesting time in the speed of loading is meaningless. The most picking force was 22.7N (variety of Kashmar, loading speed=10mm/min); and the less force of picking was 4.922N (variety of Golestan, loading speed=5mm/min). Also, the most force of picking in first harvesting belonged to Kashmar variety (23.567N), and the less force of picking in the third harvesting was also belonged to Golestan variety (5.967N). The effects of harvesting time, variety, the speed of loading and mutual effect of harvesting time on variety in 1% level, and also the mutual effect of harvesting time on the speed of loading in 5% level has meaning on picking force; but the effect of variety on the speed of loading is meaningless. The maximum and the minimum energy of picking was respectively 96.45mJ/mm (Kashmar variety, first harvesting) and 26.476 mJ/mm (Golestan variety, third harvesting). Totally, the minimum force and energy of picking were shown at Golestan variety, and the maximum force and energy of picking were shown at Kashmar variety.

Keywords


  1. Wendel, J.F., Brubaker, C., Alvarez, I., Cronn, R. and Stewart, J. MCD. 2009. Evolution and Natural History of the Cotton Genus. In Andrew H. Paterson (Ed.). Genetics and Genomics of Cotton. Plant Genetics and Genomics: Crops and Models, 3: P3-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70810-2_1.
  2. FAO. 2014. www.FAO.org.
  3. Rostami, H., Shamsabadi, H.A. and Nourozieh, S. 2017. Evaluation of Semi-Mechanized Cotton Harvester machine. Iranian Journal of Cotton Researches. 3(1): 103-118. (In Persian)
  4. Nourozieh, S., Mobli, H., Ghanadha, M.R. and Oghabi, H. 2003. An Investigation of the effect of forward speed and cutting height on quantity and quality of harvested lint by cotton picker in varamin cultivar. Journal of agricultural science (university of Tabriz). 13: 63-69. (In Persian)
  5. Deshmukh, A. and Mohanty, A. 2016. Cotton mechanisation in India and across globe: A Review. International Journal of Advance Research in Engineering, Science & Technology. 3(1): 2393-9877.
  6. Asiabani, N., Hosseinzadeh, M., Dourandish, A. and Karami, O. 2012. A Study in trend of Cotton lint production and trade and the global market Structure of Cotton lint. First International Conference on Science, Industry and Trade cotton Gorgan, Iran. (In Persian)
  7. Khazaei, J., Rabani, H. and Golbabaei, F. 2002. Determining the shear strength and picking force of pyrethrum flower. Iranian Journal Agriculture Science. 33(3): 433-444. (In Persian)
  8. Hashemifard Dehkordi, S. H. and Chegini, Gh. R. 2008. Determining the shear strength and picking force of rose flower (Rosa hybrids). The 5th National Congress on Agricultural Machinery Engineering and Mechanization. Aug. 28-29. Mashhad. Iran. (In Persian)
  9. Chegini, Gh. R. Hashemi-Fard, S. H. Kianmehr, M. H. and Khostagaza, M. H. 2008. Study of mechanical properties of chrysanthemum flower stem. The 5th National Congress on Agricultural Machinery Engineering and Mechanization. Aug. 28-29. Mashhad. Iran. (In Persian)

10. Vale Ghogdi, H., Hasan Beygi Bidgoli, SR., Saeidirad, M.H. and Kianmehr M.H. 2010. Determination of shear strength and power required for picking flowers. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research Page 4. (In Persian)

11. Sohrabi, N., Rabbani, H. and Gholami, R. 2014. Determination of Shear Strength, Tensile Strength, Cutting Energy and picking petal and sepal of Damask rose flower. Scientific Journal of Agriculture, Crop Engineering Cover number 39. (In Persian)

12. Mohsenin, N.N. 1986. Physical properties of plant and animal material, New York Gordon & Breach Science Publishers.

13. Cothren, J. 1999. Physiology of the Cotton Plant.Cotton: Origin, History, Technology, and Production. Smith, C. and Cothren, J.(edt).

14. Oosterhuis, D. and Jernstedt, J. 1999. Morphology and anatomy of cotton plant.Cotton: Origin, History, Technology and Production. Smith, C. and Cothren, J.(edt).