بررسی سودآوری اقتصادی و مالی سیستم‌های مختلف کشت پنبه و تأثیر آن بر الگوی کشت شهرستان گرگان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد اقتصاد کشاورزی دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان

2 عضو هیئت علمی گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان

3 عضو هیئت علمی گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان

4 عضو هئیت علمی مؤسسه تحقیقات پنبه کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، گرگان

چکیده

    مطالعه حاضر با هدف بررسی سودآوری اقتصادی و مالی سیستم­های مختلف کشت پنبه و تأثیر آن بر الگوی کشت شهرستان گرگان در سال زراعی 94-1393 صورت گرفته است. اطلاعات مورد نیاز از بین 50 کشاورز که اقدام به کشت پنبه در سه سیستم کشت تک­کشتی، دوکشتی (پنبه- باقلا) و مخلوط (پنبه-کنجد) نموده­اند با استفاده از روش نمونه­گیری تصادفی طبقه­ای جمع­آوری و توسط نرم‌افزار SPSS مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفته است. سپس به تعیین الگوی بهینه کشت شهرستان گرگان با استفاده از اطلاعات 295 کشاورز در شهرستان گرگان و با استفاده از مدل برنامه­ریزی ریاضی و نرم افزار GAMS پرداخته شده است. نتایج بررسی سودآوری نشان می­دهد که سیستم دوکشتی پنبه به ترتیب 18 و 26 درصد سودآوری اقتصادی بیشتر و 20 و 22 درصد سودآوری مالی بیشتر نسبت به سیستم­های تک­کشتی و مخلوط دارد. نتایج تعیین الگوی بهینه کشت شهرستان گرگان نشان می­دهد که سیستم دوکشتی پنبه به دلیل سودآوری اقتصادی و مالی بیشتر نسبت به سیستم­های دیگر در کنار سایر محصولات، در الگوی کشت شهرستان وارد شده و سایر سیستم­های کشت پنبه از مدل حذف گردید. طبق یافته­های این مطالعه پیشنهاد می­گردد که با تشویق کشاورزان به استفاده از سیستم کشت دوکشتی می­توان سطح زیرکشت پنبه را در شهرستان گرگان افزایش داد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluating the economical and financial profitability of different cotton cultivation systems and its impact on cropping pattern of Gorgan County

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fahimeh Rostami maskopaie 1
  • Ali Keramatzadeh 2
  • Ramtin joolaie 3
  • habib alaah Kashiri 4
2 Assistant Professor of Agricultural Economics, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences & Natural Resources
3 Assistant Professor of Agricultural Economics, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences & Natural Resources
4 Assistant Professor of Cotton Research Institute of Iran, gorgan
چکیده [English]

The aim of this study was evaluating the economic and financial profitability of different cotton cultivation systems and its effects on cropping pattern in Gorgan County during 2014-15. Required information has been collected by stratified random sampling method from 50 farmers who cultivate cotton in three systems of crop cultivation including mono cropping, double cropping (cotton-bean), and intercropping (cotton-sesame). Data between three cotton cultivation systems was analyzed by using SPSS software. After that, the optimal cropping pattern of Gorgan County was determined by using 295 farmers in Gorgan and using mathematical programming model with GAMS software. The results of profitability showed that, double cropping systems of cotton compared to mono cropping and inter cropping systems has more than 18 and 26 percent economic profitability and 20 and 22 percent financial profitability respectively.The results of determining the optimal cropping pattern of Gorgan county showed that, double cropping system due to more economic and financial profitability than other products, was included in the copping pattern of the county and other cotton cropping systems removed from the model. According to the results of this study, it is suggested that by encouraging farmers to use a double cropping system, the total cultivation area of cotton could be increased in Gorgan County.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Economic profitability
  • financial profitability
  • cotton intercropping systems
  • optimal cropping pattern
  • Gorgan

مراجع

  1. Annual Agricultural Statistics. Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture of Iran (2016), http://www.maj.ir.
  2. Ayoola, O.T., and Makinde, E.A. 2007. Fertilizer treatment perfomance of cassava under two planting pattern in a cassav-based cropping system.Research Journal of Agriculture and Bioligical Sciences, 3: 13-20.
  3. Baker, S.H. 1987. Effects of tillage practices on cotton double-cropped with wheat. Agronomy Journal, 79: 513-516.
  4. Bakhshi, M., and Peykani, GH. 2011. The simulation of direct payement supportive policy at agricultural subsection (application positive programming approach and entropy maximum). Iranian Journal of Economics Research and Agricultural development, 2-42(4): 501-511. (In Persian with English abstract)
  5. Bakhshi, M., Peykani, Gh., Hosseini, S., and Saleh, A. 2009. Effects of elimination fertilizer subsidy and apply direct payment policy on cropping pattern and input usage (Case study: Sabzevar Province). Agricultural economics, 2: 185-207. (In Persian with English abstract)
  6. Behbood, A., and Najafi, B. 2011. Study the effect of supportive policies on Sunflower supply. Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, 3(2): 133-146. (In Persian with English abstract)
  7. Buntin, G.D., Raymer, P.L., Bednarz, C.W., Phillips, D.V., and Baird, R.E. 2002. Winter crop, tillage and planting date effects on double – crop cotton. Agronomy Journal, 94: 273-280.
  8. Chapagain, T., and Rieseman, A. 2014. Barley-pea intercropping: Effects on land productivity, carbon and nitrogen transformation. Field Crops Research. 166: 18-25. 
  9. FAO. 2016. Crop Peoduction. Global Market Analysis. http://www.faostat.org.
  10. Ghafari Moghadam, Z. 2016. Economic evaluation of Ostrich production using the fuzzy approach in Sistan, Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science. 685-690. (In Persian with English abstract)
  11. Ghajary, A., Miry, A.S., Zangy, M.R., and Soltany, S. 2011. Determination of the best planting pattern density of early maturing cotton cultivars following canola harvesting. Iranian Society of Agronomy and Plant Breeding Sciences, Vol, 4. 4: 103-121. (In Persian with English abstract)
  12. Ghanbari, A., Dahmardeh, M., Siahsar, B.A., and Ramroudi, M. 2010. Effect of maize (Zea mays L.)-cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) intercropping on light distribution, soil temperature and soil moisture in and environment. Journal of Food, Agronomy and Environment, 8: 102-108.
  13. Ghanbari, A., Ghadiri, H., Ghafari Moghdam, M., and Safari, M. 2010. Evaluation of intercropping of maize (Zea mays L.) and cucurbit (Cucurbita sp.) and effect on weed control. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 41: 43-55. (In Persian with English abstract)
  14. Ghosh, P.K., Tripathi, A.K., Bandyopadhyay, K.K., and Manna, M.C. 2009. Assessment of nutrient competition and nutrient requirment in soybean/sorghum intercropping system. European Journal of Agronomy, 31: 43-50.
  15. Goa, Y., Duan, A., Qiu, X., Liu, Z., Sun, J., Zhang, J., and Wang, H. 2012. Distribution of root length density in maize/soybean strip intercropping system. Agricultural Water Management, 98: 199-212.
  16. Hamzei, J. 2012. Evaluation of yeild, SPAD index, land use efficiency and system productivity index of barley (Hordeum vulgare) intercropped with bitter vetch (Vicia ervilia). Journal of Crop Production and Processing. 2: 79-91. (In Persian with English abstract)
  17. Hamzei, J., and Ghamari Rahim, N. 2016. Economical evaluation intercropping bean and corn according to relative value and reduce weeds growth. Agricultural Products and Processing Journal. 6(19). (In Persian with English abstract)
  18. Hamzei, J., and Seyedi, M. 2012. Determination of the best intercropping combination of wheat and responssed based on agronomic indices, total yield and land use equivalent ratio. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 2: 109-130. (In Persian with English abstract)
  19. Hamzei, J., Seyedi, M., Ahmadvand, G., and Abutalebian, M.A. 2012. The effect of additive intercropping on weed supperssion, yeild and yeild component of chickpea and barley. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 2: 43-55. (In Persian with English abstract)
  20. Iranian Cotton Researches Center. 2017. (In Persian)
  21. Jafaraghaei, M., and Jalali, A.H. 2013. Evaluation of pattern and sowing date on the yeild of cotton and cantaloupe in a mixed farming system. Iranian Journal of cotton Researches, 1(1). (In Persian with English abstract)
  22. Javanmard, A., Rostami, A., Nooraien, M., and Gharekhani. GH. 2015. Evaluation of agricultural, ecological and economical in mixed cropping of wheat and pea in Maraghe dry condition. Knowledge and Sustainability Product Journal, 26(1). (In Persian with English abstract)
  23. Kashiri Kolaie, F., Hosseini Yekani, A., and Espanli, M. 2016. The effect of  elimination of fertilizer subsidy at producers and consumers welfare (Case study: Rice). Journal of Agricultural Economics and development, 25 (98). (In Persian with English abstract)
  24. Koopahi, M. 2006. Introduction to Agricultural Economics. University of Tehran press. 8: 151-160.
  25. Mahdavi Damghani, A., Koocheki, A., Rezvani Moghaddam, P., and Nassiri Mahallati, M. 2007. Evaluation of agrobiodiversity and its effects on the sustainability of wheat-cotton cropping system in Khorassan. Environmental Sciences, 4: 61-68. (In Persian with English abstract)
  26. Mazaheri, D., and Oveysi, M. 2004. Effects of intercropping of two varieties at various nitrogen levels. Journal of Agronomy, 2: 71-76. (In Persian with English abstract)
  27. Mirhashemi, S.M., Kochaki, A., Parsa, M., and Nasiri Mahalati, M. 2009. Study intercropping advantage of Fenugreek and Zenian in different level of livestock fertilizer and implant arrangement. Iranian Agricultural Researches. 7(1): 271-281. (In Persian with English abstract)
  28. Moradi, P., Asghari, J., Mohsen Abadi, GH., and Samizadeh, H. 2016. Evaluation of profitability of triple intercropping Corn (Zea mays L.), Pinto beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and paper seeds squash (Cucurbita pepo L.). Agricultural Products and Processing Journal. 6 (19). (In Persian with English abstract)
  29. Mortazavi, A., Abasmiri, S., and Alaie Borojeni, P. 2013. Effects of pricing policy at rapeseed production in Iran. Economics Research quarterly Journal, 13(4): 127-146. (In Persian with English abstract)
  30. Mosadegh, S., Ahmadian, M.A., Jafari, H., and Jahani, M. 2017. Study the effective factors on strategic cultivation changes in Gorgan County. Geographical Planning of Space Quarterly Journal. 7 (26): 69-82. (In Persian with English abstract)
  31. Niazi, A., and Abyar, N. 2004. Effecting of cultivation development and yield at wheat production increasing in Iran. 6th Agriculture Economic Conference. Mashad. (In Persian)
  32. Pishbahar, A., and Khodabakhsi, S. 2014. Effecting elimination agricultural inputs subsidy on cultivation crop pattern in Varamin province. Agricultural Economics Research, 6(2): 53-68. (In Persian with English abstract)
  33. Rastegaripour, F., Tavasoli, A., Ghanbari, A., and Sabohi, M. 2013. The impact of relative advantage and economic evaluation of mono-cropping and intercropping of Leguminous and cereals. Agriculture economics and development, 91: 211-213. (In Persian with English abstract)
  34. Rostami, F., Keramatzadeh, A., Joolaie, R., and Kashiri, H. 2015. Economical survey of input application in Gorgan cotton production. Iranian Journal of Cotton Researches, 3(1): 15-31. (In Persian with English abstract)
  35. Sadatbarikani, H., and Azari, A. 2012. Effectiveness of agricultural supportive policies on rice product in Iran. Agricultural Economics Research, 4(3): 185-205. (In Persian with English abstract)
  36. Sadroashrafi, M., and Alikhani, M. 2010. Economic effects analysis of government intervention policies on cotton pricing in Iran. Agricultural Economics Journal. 4(1): 31-49.
  37. Saleem, M.F., Anjum, S.A., Shakeel, A., Ashraf, M.Y., and Khan, H.Z. 2009. Effect of row spacing on earliness and yield in cotton, Pakistan. Journal of Botany, 41(5): 2179-2188.
  38. Sedeghi, A., Sirosmehr, A., Ramzani Moghadam, M., Asgharipour, M., and Esmailian, Y. 2011. Evaluation of yield and cotton variation fibers quality in cultivate different times in double cropping. Journal of Iranian Plant Eco physiological Research, 6(24): 26-36. (In Persian with English abstract)
  39. Sedeghi, A., Sirosmehr, A., Ramzani Moghadam, M., Asgharipour, M., and Esmailian, Y. 2013. Study the cotton varieties reaction at mono-cropping and double cropping after barley in Gonabad climate condition. Agroecology Journal, 5(1): 58-66.
  40. Sepehrdost, H., and Emami, S. 2016. The impact of comparative advantage and effect of government policy at potato production in Hamedan Province. Agricultural Economics Research, 9(1): 51-70. (In Persian with English abstract)
  41. Seyedi, M., Daneshvar Kakhki, M. 2014. Cotton production economic: The study of cost efficiency and agricultural profit of cotton work in Bashroye. Journal of Agricultural Economics and development, 28 (4): 360-367. (In Persian with English abstract)
  42. Zafar, Y., Mansor, S., Asad, S., Rahman, M., Mukhtar, Z., and Asif, M. 2007. Current status and prospects of biotech cotton in Pakistan. In Regional consultation on biotech cotton for risk assessment and opportunities for small cotton grows, March 6-8. NIBGE, Faisalabad. 85-91.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار